Legal Opinion
In Re L.A.M. & Associates
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided May 6, 1998No. 04-97-00896-CVPublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNCAN, Justice.
L.A.M. and Associates seeks a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Martha Tanner to vacate a sanctions order she rendered against L.AM. on the oral motion of the attorney for Christopher Kopecky, M.D. We conditionally issue the writ.
Factual and Procedural Summary
L.AM. owns and is attempting to collect an October 1992 judgment against Kopecky. L.A.M. therefore filed applications for writs of garnishment directed to five financial institutions in which it believed Kopecky maintained financial accounts, and it filed an ap plication for an order requiring Kopecky to turn over…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Latty v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Schultz v. Fifth Judicial District Court of Appeals at DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Unifund CCR Partners v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Acceptance Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Gutierrez v. Cayman Islands Firm of Deloitte & Touche, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- City of Texarkana v. Cities of New Boston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Neasbitt v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.