Legal Opinion

City of Texarkana v. Cities of New Boston

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided July 23, 2004No. 06-04-00023-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Chief Justice MORRISS.

Seven cities 1 to which the City of Texar-kana, Texas, d/b/a Texarkana Water Utilities, has been supplying water for decades sued Texarkana in both contract and tort, asserting various causes of action arising from that relationship. Texarkana asserted below that governmental immunity completely bars the suit, but the trial court rejected its assertion. Texarkana now asks this Court to uphold its claim of governmental immunity and dismiss the action entirely. Although we agree with Texarkana that governmental immunity bars the causes of action sounding…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of San Antonio v. BSR Water Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  5. Texas Ass'n of School Boards Risk Management Fund v. Benavides Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API