State v. Hassler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} Nearly 20 years ago, in Newark v. Lucas (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 100, 532 N.E.2d 130, we held that under the prior version of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1), “the results of a properly administered bodily substances test * * * may be admitted in evidence despite the fact that the bodily substance was withdrawn more than two hours from the time of the alleged violation.” Id. at paragraph two of the syllabus. According to one of the appellate judges on the panel that decided this present case, our recent decision in State v. Mayl, 106 Ohio St.3d 207, 2005-Ohio-4629, 833 N.E.2d 1216, has cast doubt over…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MaylOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Newark v. LucasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CichonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by27 opinions
- New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. FridleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. BargerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. HollisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.