Legal Opinion

Sholom, Inc. v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1967No. [No. 239, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

In this condemnation proceeding the appellee (Commission) seeks to acquire the leasehold interest of the appellant (Sholom) in property belonging to appellee (Armstrong) lying at the intersection of Central Avenue and Capital Beltway in Prince George’s County. The trial judge held that because Sholom had not exercised options to extend its lease for two additional five year terms, its compensable interest must be restricted to the residue (16 months) of the first 5 year term. Sholom also had an option to buy during the first S year term. Because it had not exercised its option the trial judge…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Eagle Lake Improvement Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  4. Gluck v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. LatrobeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mount Juneau Enterprises, Inc. v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
  4. Spokane School District No. 81 v. ParzybokWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Stevan v. BrownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API