Mayor of Baltimore v. Latrobe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Stockbridge, J.) The trial Court, sitting as a jury, found “that Ferdinand C. Latrobe et al., trustees, owners of a ground rent on the lot described, to wit, a lot 28x123 will be damaged to the amount of $2,500'by being restricted to the collection bf the same to a lot of 28x33; said amount being the damage on the market value of the said ground.rent.”
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.
There are two appeals in this record—the one being by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Ferdinand C. Latrobe et al., Trustees, and the other a cross-appeal by those trustees from the rulings of the Baltimore City Court. Under and by virtue of an ordinance of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, passed in pursuance of an Act of the General Assem-, bly of Maryland, being ch. 87 of the Laws of 1904, what is known as “The Burnt District Commission” was authorized to acquire for the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, by various methods named in the Act, including that by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Corrigan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Holland v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Hintze v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Baltimore & Ohio Rail Road v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Rice.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- City of St. Louis v. RossiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State Ex Rel. McCaskill v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- City of Pasadena v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.