State Ex Rel. Blair v. Gettinger
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Gilkison, C. J.
I am unable to agree with the majority opinion, for the following reasons:
I think the teacher’s contract in question is, in every particular, a legal contract. It is the uniform standard contract prepared by the administrative and legal experts of the state of Indiana, and is the product of many years of experience, of many scores of legislative sessions, of the legal staffs of many governors, and the *605best efforts of fifty or more attorneys general and their numerous deputies and assistants. These and similar teacher’s contracts have been before the court in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jenkins v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Rhoades v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
- Gilchrist v. HatchIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Illinois Pipe Line Co. v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- Kain v. RinkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.