Legal Opinion

Kain v. Rinker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1891No. 45PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court;

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, C. J.

This was an action by the appellant, John W. Kain, against the appellee, on a promissory note governed by the law merchant, made by the appellee to the appellant, for three hundred dollars, with interest at the rate of eight per cent., payable annually.

A demurrer to the answer was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error.

By the answer the appellee admitted the execution of the note sued on, and alleged, in substance, that it was illegal as to its consideration and every part thereof, in this, that it was given in renewal of a note for the same amount executed by the appellee to one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Fisher v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Farmers & Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Baxter v. I.S.T.A. Insurance TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Wabash Railroad v. GrateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. McCarthy v. Miller, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Bowser v. SpiesshoferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API