Legal Opinion
Comprehensive Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Care, LLC v. Axtmayer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 20, 2009No. SC 18304PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN,
J. The sole issue on appeal is whether the arbitrator exceeded his authority in declining to award attorney’s fees pursuant to the parties’ arbitration agreement. The plaintiffs, Comprehensive Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Care, LLC (Comprehensive), and certain physician members of Comprehensive,1 appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court, which denied the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate in part the arbitration award pursuant to General Statutes § 52-418 (a) (4),3 because it concluded that the arbitrator did not exceed his authority by determining that Comprehensive did…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bacon Construction Co. v. Department of Public WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Teamsters Local Union No. 677 v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Kellogg v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Knox v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.