Legal Opinion

Kellogg v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 22, 2017No. SC19803PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD'Auria, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court properly vacated an arbitration award setting the amount of an insured loss caused by a tree falling on the insured's home. We conclude that the trial court improperly substituted its judgment for that of the appraisal panel, and we therefore reverse the trial court's judgment.

The plaintiff, Sally Kellogg, is the owner of a historic property in the city of Norwalk (property). She insured the property through a "[r]estorationist" policy issued by the defendant, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company. This restorationist policy was different from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Industrial Risk Insurers v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Signal 88 v. LyconicNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. R & P Realty Co. v. Peerless Indemnity Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. Torrington v. Council 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Local 442Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. Signal 88 v. LyconicNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. DeRose v. Jason Robert's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API