Legal Opinion
Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 21, 1981PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbmentano, J.
The underlying facts in this case establish the following: In early 1976, the plaintiff, Bic Pen Corporation (the company), reorganized its central toolroom department into three smaller departments: (1) the mold toolroom; (2) R & D toolroom; and (3) factory service toolroom. Article IY (n) of the 1975 collective bargaining agreement between the parties provided that “[a] 11 overtime within a department will be distributed equally among the employees in the department qualified to do the work . . . The plaintiff devised the reorganization not only to increase efficiency, but also to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Bridgeport v. Bridgeport Police Local 1159Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Board of Education v. Bridgeport Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Waterbury Board of Education v. Waterbury Teachers Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- City of Waterbury v. Waterbury Police UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Board of Trustees v. Federation of Technical College TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- City of New Haven v. AFSCME, Council 15, Local 530Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.