Legal Opinion

Knox v. Smith

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 29, 2011No. AC 31608PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The defendants, Robert M. Smith, M.D., LLC, and Robert M. Smith, appeal from the judgments of the trial court denying their amended application to vacate an arbitration award and confirming the award in favor of the plaintiff, Thomas I. Knox. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly confirmed the award because the arbitrator acted with manifest disregard of the law in contravention of General Statutes § 52-418 (a) (4). We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The record reveals the following relevant facts and procedural history. On January 20, 2008, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. City of Bridgeport v. Kasper Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Nussbaum v. Kimberly Timbers, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Between Rounds Franchise Corp. v. EDGR Real Estate, LLCConnecticut Superior Court · 2011
  2. Com. v. Leatherby, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API