Carmichael v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.
[¶ 1] In this consolidated appeal, Stephen Carmichael and Everett M. Ashby contend that the Superior Court (Somerset and Cumberland Counties, Mills, J. and Wheeler, J.) erred in dismissing their petitions for post-conviction review. Based upon the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and our decision in State v. Schofield, 2005 ME 82, 895 A.2d 927, the petitioners claim that their sentences violate the Sixth Amendment. The petitioners contend that Blakely and Schofield newly recognized constitutional rights that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- State v. SmartAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Alexandre v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Reese v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.