Legal Opinion

Reese v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 7, 2017No. Docket: Sag-16-5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] Olland Reese appeals from a judgment of the trial court (Sagadahoc County, Warren, J.) dismissing Grounds 1-5 of his second petition for post-conviction review prior to the evidentiary hearing on the petition. Those grounds asserted that Reese’s counsel in his first petition for post-conviction review, which was denied in 2009, was ineffective. The court concluded that Maine law does not permit a second petition to challenge the effectiveness of counsel who represented a petitioner in a prior petition, and that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Henry Hodges v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Robert Jones, Jr. v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Juan Carlos Chavez v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olland Reese v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Salley v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Salley v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Salley v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API