Legal Opinion

State v. Smart

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2009No. S-12493, S-12543PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The question presented in these two cases is whether the right to a jury trial announced in Blakely v. Washington 1 should be retroactively applied to two state defendants, Troy Smart and Henry Douglas, whose sentences were final before June 24, 2004, when Blakety was decided. Blakely requires that any fact-except a fact admitted by the defendant or the fact of a prior conviction-necessary to increase a sentence above the statutory presumptive maximum be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We decline to give Blakely full retroactivity. We…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. Douglas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Charles v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API