Legal Opinion

Lightfoot v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 2, 1991No. 1900599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Thomas Jimmie Lightfoot, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Thomas D. McDonald, in a legal malpractice suit. Lightfoot's claim stems out of McDonald's representation of Lightfoot in a 1984 criminal prosecution for rape.

The facts leading up to this appeal are as follows: In 1983, in Madison County, Alabama, Lightfoot was indicted for rape in the first degree. A trial ensued, in which the State provided physical evidence of Lightfoot's hair, semen, and clothing fibers found on the victim's body. There was testimony placing Lightfoot at the scene of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Reeves v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Herston v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Hubbard v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midgett v. Cook Inlet Pre-Trial FacilityAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Morrison v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Herring v. ParkmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. McGhee v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  5. Veteto v. SWANSON SERVICES CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API