Legal Opinion

Herring v. Parkman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 28, 1994No. 1921269, 1921270PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bennie D. Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, and Dee Dee Bell appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants James W. Parkman III and John E. Gormley in their actions alleging legal malpractice and fraud. The issues are whether Billy Herring and Bell presented substantial evidence of malpractice on the part of Parkman, whether the Herrings and Bell presented substantial evidence of fraudulent conduct on the part of Parkman or Gormley, and whether the Herrings and Bell presented a sufficient response under Rule 56(f), A.R.Civ.P., to the motions for summary judgment, showing what…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Reeves v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Baker v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Specialty Container Manufacturing, Inc. v. Rusken Packaging, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Luke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Covington Pike Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Gewin v. TCF Asset Management Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Morrison v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Independent Stave v. Bell, Richardson Etc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Surrett v. TIG Premier Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API