Anderson v. City of Columbus, Georgia
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAND, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all claims asserted by Plaintiff in her Complaint. Those claims are as follows: a violation of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“Title III”), 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq.; a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and state law claims for a violation of the Georgia wiretap statute, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff asserts these claims against the City of Columbus, Georgia and two of its employees. The claims against the employees are made in their…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Backhaut v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Debra Seitz v. City of Elgin, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Walden v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
- Williams v. City of Tulsa, OkDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2005
- Kaeli Garner, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.