Legal Opinion
Williams v. City of Tulsa, Ok
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 30, 2005No. 4:04-cv-00326PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
H. DALE COOK, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant City of Tulsa’s (the “City”) Motions for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # s 23; 24; 25; and 26] and Defendants Bill Fall-Leaf, Eric Mur-dock, Debra Carr, Mark Rogers, and Joe Harris’ (the “Supervisors”) Motions for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #s 27; 28; 29; 30; and 31]. Based on the pleadings, the evidence presented, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the motions for summary judgment are meritorious and should be GRANTED.
UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
I. The City’s Underground Collections Department (“UCD”) is responsible for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Debra Seitz v. City of Elgin, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Rosario v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- Adams v. Luzerne CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Garza v. Bexar Metropolitan Water DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
- Marriott v. USD 204, Bonner Springs-EdwardsvilleDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.