Legal Opinion
Braut v. Tarabochia
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 12, 2001No. 46019-6-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, C.J.
The Wierzbickis contest the trial court’s admission of a photocopy of a promissory note in a mortgage foreclosure action. We conclude that the trial court based its decision to admit the photocopy on tenable grounds and affirm.
FACTS
John Braut, the former president, director, and majority shareholder of Inseafuture, Inc., a Washington corporation *730that has since been administratively dissolved, claims that on July 28,1979, he loaned Arthur and Marilyn Tarabochia $30,000 secured by a recorded mortgage on their Seattle home. The Tarabochias never made a payment on this alleged loan.
When the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- State v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Dahlgren v. BlomeenWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Watkins v. Restorative Care Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kappelman v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Kappelman v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Columbia State Bank v. Amas And Tanana CanzoniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014