Legal Opinion

Dahlgren v. Blomeen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1956No. 33425PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is an appeal from a decree in favor of the respondent, Carl Blomeen, impressing a lien upon the net estate of Ellen S. Ross, deceased. The appellant, Mamie Dahlgren, is executrix and residuary legatee under the will of Ellen S. Ross.

The lien imposed by the trial court was based upon two findings: first, that the parties had entered into an oral agreement to make and maintain mutual wills; and second, that the decedent had executed a. written agreement to make and keep in effect a will leaving her net estate to the respondent in consideration of his conveying to her the lot on which the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Creasman v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hill v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Edwall v. JessephWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McCullough v. McCulloughWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Poole v. SchrichteWashington Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re the Marriage of LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In re PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Marriage of PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Peffley-Warner v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API