Legal Opinion

Chafin v. Grayson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 2002No. 18A02-0102-CV-78PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Leann Chafin appeals the trial court's grant of a motion to correct errors in favor of Cleveland Grayson setting aside the jury verdict and ordering a new trial in Grayson's negligence action against Chaf-in. We remand.

Issue

Chaffin raises two issues for our review, one of which we find dispositive: whether the trial court failed to make special findings of fact as required by Indiana Trial Rule 59(J)(7).

Facts and Procedural History

The facts reveal that on February 11, 1997, Grayson and Chafin were involved in a motor vehicle accident on State Road 35 *476in Muncie, Indiana.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. DeVittorio v. Werker Bros., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Precision Screen MacHines, Inc. v. HixsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Schuh v. SilcoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. McKenzieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. AguilarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Weida v. KegariseIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Weida v. KegariseIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Chafin v. GraysonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Pendleton v. AguilarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API