Legal Opinion

Weida v. Kegarise

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 2005No. 66A03-0406-CV-247PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Thomas Weida admitted negligence in rear-ending Donald Kegarise in an automobile accident, but he disputed the amount of damages Kegarise claimed. At trial, the jury found in favor of Weida. The trial court ordered a new trial subject to additur of $23,849.40 under Trial Rule 59(J) but failed to enter findings supporting its order. We remand for entry of the findings Rule 59 requires.

Facts and Procedural History

Weida rear-ended Kegarise on February 25, 2002. The record contains little specific information about the accident because Weida stipulated that his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Kennedy v. Guess, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Tunender v. MinnaertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kocher v. GetzIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Indian Trucking v. HarberIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weida v. KegariseIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API