Legal Opinion
Davoust v. Mitchell
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 1970No. 769A131PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, C.J.
Plaintiffs, appellees herein, filed their complaint in two paragraphs for reasons of an alleged nuisance in keeping a dog pen, and for damage to their basement as a result of seepage of water, praying for an injunction and damages.
Appellants answered each of the paragraphs of .the complaint under Rule 1-3 and the case was submitted to trial by the court without a jury.
The court entered judgment and ordered that appellees recover upon Paragraph I of their complaint and that the nuisance alleged be abated and the dog pen removed within sixty days, except the concrete slab in the pen was not to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Owen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Meeks v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wernke v. HalasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Rust v. GuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Friendship Farms Camps, Inc. v. ParsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.