Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lamm

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1916No. 8,824PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Miami Circuit Court; Joseph N. Tillett, Special Judge. Action by Willis C. Lamm against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant' appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.

Appellee, whose property abuts upon appellant’s right of way, recovered judgment for damages in the sum of $500, claimed to have been suffered by reason of appellant’s raising its railroad grade some twelve feet and constructing an additional track. In this appeal, which is from a judgment rendered on the verdict of a jury for the foregoing damages, appellant assigns as error the refusal of the court to grant appellant’s petition to correct the record' nunc pro tunc; the overruling of appellant’s demurrer to the first and second paragraphs of complaint; and the overruling of appellant’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Yost v. ConroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schiro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Stowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Davoust v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Button v. Pennsylvania RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API