Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Byrd
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 14, 2009No. Misc. Docket AG No. 69, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule JG~751(a), 1 filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Ralph T. Byrd, Respondent. Bar Counsel charged Respondent with violating the following Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”): 1.1 (Competence), 2 1.3 (Diligence), 3 1.4(a)(2) (Communication), 4 3.1 (Meritorious Claims and Contentions), 5 3.2 (Expediting Litigation), 6 3.3(a)(1) (Candor Toward the Tribunal), 7 3.4(c) and (d) (Fair ness to Opposing Party and Counsel), 8 and 8.4(b), (c) and (d)…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Walker-TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.