Arnold v. Masonic Country Club
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
The questions raised by the appeals are:
1. Did plaintiff have an annual .contract of employment?
2. Did the yearly period begin on January 1st or April 1st?
3. Do the facts show accord and satisfaction?
4. Did plaintiff split his cause of action?
The employment of plaintiff to begin on April 1, 1922, was authorized by a resolution of defendant’s board of directors, which fixed the compensation as $2,000 a year and the use of a house. Plaintiff accepted and continued in defendant’s service for about nine years during which time the compensa tion was paid each week. The corporate records show a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cutter v. GilletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Continental Insurance v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Dutton v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Webb v. DepewMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Gallino v. BolandMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Avellanet v. Porto Rican Express Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
- Brownridge v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Howard v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Boland v. C D Barnes Associates, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.