Legal Opinion
Howard v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1945No. 12934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant as plaintiff brought this action to compel appellee as defendant to restore his seniority rights, to restore him to employment from which he had been discharged, and for damages suffered because of his unlawful discharge. We shall refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court.
Plaintiff alleged that he was discharged unlawfully and without cause; that defendant had refused to reinstate him to his former employment in violation of the terms of the written contract between the defendant and the Order of Railroad Telegraphers, a labor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Baron v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Price v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Ransome Concrete Machinery Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Runyan v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schatte v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture MacHine Operators of United States and CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Lloyd L. Hayes, Hayes, Inc. v. T. G. Solomon, Gulf States Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Francisco E. Sandobal, Also Known as Francisco E. Sandoval v. Armour and Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Robert Edward Lipscomb v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Turner Glass Corporation v. Hartford-Empire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.