Legal Opinion
DeFries v. Town of Washington, Okl.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 31, 1995No. CIV-94-1146-APublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, which the Court has previously advised the parties would be decided pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P. The parties have received ample opportunity to present all pertinent materials, and the motion is now ready for decision.
The following statement contains undisputed facts presented by defendants in their initial and reply briefs, as well as additional facts presented by plaintiff in his response and surreply briefs. For purposes of this Order, the Court will assume all are true.
STATEMENT OF…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harper v. Mancos School District Re-6District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Dehart v. City of Manhattan, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Bjorklund v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
- Opinion No. (2008), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2008