Legal Opinion

Childers v. Paul

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1936No. 26399PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by Haskell Paul, ns plaintiff, against C. O. Childers, State Auditor of the state of Oklahoma, as defendant, for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring said defendant to audit and allow a salary claim of the plaintiff. The district court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant appeals. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appear in the trial court.

The cause was submitted to the trial court upon the pleadings and agreed statement of facts. Therefore, as pointed out by Mr. Justice Riley in his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Hudson v. Hopkins &8212 McGuire v. McCurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Champlin Refining Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Realty Mortgage & Sales Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Sheridan Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. DinwiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API