Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hall v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1997No. 95-903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals vacated the commission’s order and directed it to issue a new order finding that claimant continued to be permanently and totally disabled. Upon review, we affirm that judgment, but do so for reasons other than those relied upon by that court.

In State ex rel. Draganic v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 461, 663 N.E.2d 929, issued subsequent to the lower court’s decision in this case, we reversed the judgment of the court of appeals. In Draganic, we held that the commission is not required to extend permanent total disability compensation beyond the date specified in an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Paraskevopoulos v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Hartness v. Kroger Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Hall v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Roy v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Paraskevopoulos v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API