Legal Opinion

State v. Matthews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1980No. 108PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

We find no merit in any assignment of error brought forward by either defendant.

Defendant Snow’s Appeal

By his first assignment of error defendant Snow contends the trial court erred in allowing the state to challenge two jurors after the state had accepted them. There is no merit in the assignment.

After the state had passed on a panel of jurors, the court allowed the state to use one of its peremptory challenges and excuse Mrs. Loman after she told defense counsel that she did not want to sit on the case, “that she did not want this matter on her conscience”. The court also…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API