Legal Opinion

Nottingham v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1989No. CA CR 89-55PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

The appellant, Larry Nottingham, appeals his conviction of DWI, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-65-103 (1987). Upon conviction, his driver’s license was suspended for a period of ninety days, and he was fined $500, plus costs. On appeal, the appellant contends that it was error for the trial court to have allowed the admission of certain testimony on grounds of hearsay; that the evidence used against him should have been suppressed based on the arresting officer’s lack of reasonable suspicion; and further, that there was no probable cause for his arrest. We find no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Bliss v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Dandridge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Tillman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Willett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kathleen Suggs v. Dorothy Stanley and Betty HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Lambert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Frette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API