Legal Opinion

Willett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 1989No. CR 88-205PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

On September 13, 1988, the jury convicted the appellant of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver and, as an habitual offender, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. He argues three points on his appeal: (1) the trial court erred in holding that the police had reasonable cause to stop and search the vehicle; (2) the trial court erred in sustaining the prosecution’s objection to identification of the confidential informant; and (3) it was error to justify the search on the basis of “exigent” circumstances. We do not find prejudicial error. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Tillman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wofford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Benny Lee Willett v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Hammons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Bohanan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API