Legal Opinion

Kathleen Suggs v. Dorothy Stanley and Betty Hendricks

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2003No. 02-1832, 02-1935PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

This defamation action was brought by Kathleen Suggs against Dorothy Stanley and Betty Hendricks, the sisters of her deceased companion. The jury ruled in favor of Suggs, and the sisters appeal from the judgment, contending that the district court2 erred by denying their motion for judgment as a matter of law and that it improperly admitted certain evidence. Suggs filed a cross appeal based on her unsuccessful attempt to assert a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm.

I

Dorothy Stanley and Betty Hendricks had one brother, Gilbert Wicker, who was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. EFCO Corp. v. Symons Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Ellis v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kozlov v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Two ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Cameron FosterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Suggs v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API