Legal Opinion
Frette v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided June 18, 1997No. CA CR 96-477PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.
Paul Frette was charged with violating Ark. Code Ann. § 27-23-113 (Supp. 1993), which prohibits a person from operating or being in physical control of a commercial motor vehicle while having alcohol in his system. His pretrial motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of his arrest was denied. Pursuant to Rule 24.3(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, he entered a conditional guilty plea to the charge, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. He was fined $250.00, plus costs, and his driver’s license was suspended for 120…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frette v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Frazier v. WhismanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Frette v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.