Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Bank of Hawaii & DeYoung

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2000No. 21394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

KLEIN, J.

This appeal arises out of a dispute between claimant-appellant Bank of Hawaii (BOH) and garnishee-appellee City Bank (City Bank) regarding the garnishment by BOH of stock pledged as collateral for a loan to City Bank by James DeYoung (DeYoung). After initially granting a garnishment order in favor of BOH, the first circuit court granted City Bank’s motion- to dissolve the garnishment order on grounds that (1) DeYoung’s pledged stock might not be garnishable under Hawafi law as a debt that was due and owing; and (2) BOH’s garnishment of the shares would…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Amantiad v. OdumHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BarancoHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. F. W. Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Cabatbat v. County of Hawai'i, Department of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Coulson v. Kane (In re Price)District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  4. Gary Willingham v. Gallatin Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. Herrmann v. Herrmann.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API