Legal Opinion

State v. Baranco

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1994No. 16911PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

Defendants-Appellants Victor W. Baranco and Cynthia A. Baranco (collectively Defendants) were indicted by Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii (Prosecution) for promoting a dangerous drug in the second degree in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1242(l)(a) (Supp.1992). Following a mistrial, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the indictment with prejudice, arguing that a retrial would violate their constitutional right against double jeopardy. Defendants appeal the circuit court’s order denying their motion to dismiss the indictment with prejudice. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API