Legal Opinion
Halozyme, Inc. v. Iancu
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1580Published
1Opinion of the Court
CLAUDE M. HILTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*794THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Halozyme, Inc.'s ("Halozyme") Complaint pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking reversal of a patent rejection decision issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO").
I. Background
Halozyme brought this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, challenging a final decision issued by the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the "Board") which affirmed the rejections of claims in U.S. Patent Application 11/238,171 ("the '171 application"). The claims were rejected on four independent grounds:
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.