Securities & Exchange Commission v. Vitesse Semiconductor Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the joint proposal of plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“S.E.C.”) and three of the five defendants — Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation (“Vitesse”), Yatin D. Mody, and Nicole R. Kaplan — to approve Consent Judgments that would resolve the case as to these defendants. The proposal raises difficult questions of whether the S.E.C.’s practice of accepting settlements in which the defendants neither admit nor deny the S.E.C.’s allegations meets the standards necessary for approval by a district court.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,576 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James H. Randolph, Jr., and Charles BlackardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Trucking Employers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. v. Vigilant InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CioffiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CR Intrinsic Investors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CR Intrinsic Investors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.