Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 16, 2013No. 12 Civ. 8466 (VM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
On November 20, 2012, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) brought this action against defendants CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC (“CR Intrinsic”)/Mathew Martoma (“Martoma”), and Sidney Gilman (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 785(b) (“§ 10(b)”), Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (“Rule 10b — 5”), and § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77q (“§ 17(a)”).
On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Vitesse Semiconductor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CR Intrinsic Investors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. Orthofix, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. McLellanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024