Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 18, 2014No. 12-cv-8466 (VM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

By Decision and Order dated April 15, 2013 (the “Conditional Approval Order”), the Court granted conditional approval of six proposed consent judgments (the “Proposed Consent Judgments”): one between plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and defendant CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC (“CR Intrinsic”), and one each between the SEC and relief defendants CR Intrinsic Investments, LLC; S.A.C. Capital Advisors, LLC; S.A.C. Capital Associates, LLC; S.A.C. International Equities, LLC; and S.A.C. Select Fund, LLC…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kashi v. GratsosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Vitesse Semiconductor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CioffiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. BeasleyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API