Legal Opinion
Sherback v. Wright Automotive Group
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 12, 1997No. Civ.A. 96-1673PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEE, District Judge.
After due consideration of defendant Wright Automotive Group’s Motion for Summary Judgment with brief in support, plaintiff John Sherbaek’s response and brief in opposition, and the affidavits, documents and other materials submitted in support of and in opposition to summary judgment, this Court will deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment because there exist genuine issues of material fact as to whether plaintiff is disabled as a result of post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 United…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard McAlindin v. County of San Diego Rudolph Tamayo Edward Baker Gabriel Rodriguez Does, One Through 50, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jensen v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Rohan v. Networks Presentation, LLC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Richard McAlindin v. County of San Diego Rudolph Tamayo Edward Baker Gabriel Rodriguez Does, One Through 50, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000