Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Coe

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1954No. 5816PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Claimant sues for workmen’s compensation and-for an additional 50% as penalty for failure of the employer to provide safety devices. In October 195,0, while claimant was engaged in repairing a sewer line, the ditch in which hie was working caved in, 'febvérihg him-to the waist. At the same tithe, he was-hit on the right shoulder b;y a-'piece-of-'asphalt. Subsequently, in November Í953,: he filed a -claim for compensa.tiori as- a result of- the shoulder injury. Among the defenses pleaded, appellees asserted the statute of limitations. After issue was joined, appellees took…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Anderson v. Contract Trucking Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sanderson & Porter v. CrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Harlow v. HareNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Kurtz v. Sunderland Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gomez v. Hausman CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Armijo v. United States Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Yardman v. CooperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Letteau v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Long v. WeaverNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API