Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Hausman Corporation
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 10, 1971No. 719PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWAN, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his claim for compensation on the ground that it was not timely filed.
We reverse.
In workmen’s compensation cases, as in others, we are bound to view the evidence, together with all reasonable inferences, in the light most favorable to support the findings. Duran v. New Jersey Zinc Company, 83 N.M. 38, 487 P.2d 1343 (1971). We now do so.
On April 13, 1966, the plaintiff then 30 years old and with a ninth grade education, went to work for the defendant employer as a helper. On July 23, 1966, he was promoted to machine operator. His…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Noland v. Young Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Blancett v. Homestake-Sapin PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Duran v. New Jersey Zinc CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Rayburn v. Boys Super Market, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Cordova v. Union Baking CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Casias v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Perez v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Trujillo v. Beaty Elec. Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- De La Torre v. Kennecott Copper CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sedillo v. Levi-Strauss Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.