Kobilkin v. Pillsbury
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant filed a claim for compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S. C. A. § 901 et seq. Upon denial of his claim he brought suit by petition in equity to set aside the order of the deputy commissioner, invoking § 21(b) of the act. The appeal is from a decree granting a motion to dismiss, addressed to the petition.
Appellant, as the pleading discloses, was employed by the Matson Navigation Company as a longshoreman. On June 7, 1935, during the unloading of a vessel, a bag of sugar which was being raised from the hold dropped off a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. Safety Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Guderian v. Sterling Sugar & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- McGuire v. Phelan-Shirley Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Griffin v. Rustless Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Deer v. New York Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Modin v. Matson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.