Legal Opinion

Kobilkin v. Pillsbury

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1939No. 9034PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant filed a claim for compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S. C. A. § 901 et seq. Upon denial of his claim he brought suit by petition in equity to set aside the order of the deputy commissioner, invoking § 21(b) of the act. The appeal is from a decree granting a motion to dismiss, addressed to the petition.

Appellant, as the pleading discloses, was employed by the Matson Navigation Company as a longshoreman. On June 7, 1935, during the unloading of a vessel, a bag of sugar which was being raised from the hold dropped off a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. Safety Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Guderian v. Sterling Sugar & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. McGuire v. Phelan-Shirley Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Griffin v. Rustless Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Deer v. New York Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  4. Modin v. Matson Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API