Legal Opinion
Alabama v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided July 25, 2006No. CV-90-BE-01331-EPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOWDRE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the court on Florida’s Renewed Motion for Temporary Restraining Order to Protect Threatened and Endangered Mussels (doc. 496). In this Motion, Florida requests that the court order the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) to maintain water releases of 6,300 cubic feet per second (“cfs”) from the Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam until September 5, 2006, when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issues its biological opinion. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that Florida’s Motion is due to be DENIED for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State of Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- National Wildlife Federation, Great Bear Foundation v. Burlington Northern Railroad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Animal Welfare Institute v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. GutierrezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Animal Welfare Institute v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Animal Protection Institute v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.