Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. Gutierrez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 18, 2008No. 1:06-cr-00245PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE THE EXISTENCE OF IRREPARABLE HARM DURING THE INTERIM PERIOD AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS FOR EMERGENCY INTERIM REMEDIES REGARDING FLOWS ON CLEAR CREEK AND GATE OPERATIONS AT RED BLUFF DIVERSION DAM

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................1198

II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW..................................................1199

A. Jurisdiction .........................................................1199

B. Agencies’ General Obligations Under the ESA ..........................1199

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Pacific Coast Federation Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Defenders of Wildlife v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
  5. Idaho Rivers United v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API