Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. Gutierrez
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE THE EXISTENCE OF IRREPARABLE HARM DURING THE INTERIM PERIOD AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS FOR EMERGENCY INTERIM REMEDIES REGARDING FLOWS ON CLEAR CREEK AND GATE OPERATIONS AT RED BLUFF DIVERSION DAM
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................1198
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW..................................................1199
A. Jurisdiction .........................................................1199
B. Agencies’ General Obligations Under the ESA ..........................1199
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Pacific Coast Federation Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Defenders of Wildlife v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Idaho Rivers United v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.