Lockwood v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
*430OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
A jury convicted David Lockwood of criminal mischief by damaging a city water meter and assessed his punishment at 270 days’ confinement and a $1,000 fine. Lockwood contends in two points that: (1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to prove (a) he is the person who damaged the water meter or (b) he received the economic benefit of a public water supply; and (2) the court abused its discretion by charging the jury on the statutory presumption provided by section 28.03(c) of the Penal Code because (a) the State failed to prove that he received the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Sells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Stroud v. Grubb, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Donald H. Willis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Donald H. Willis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.