Johnson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.
Marcus Johnson appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03(a) (Vernon 2003). We affirm.
I. Sufficiency of the Evidence. Johnson’s first and fourth issues concern the factual sufficiency of the evidence.
A. Standard of Review. In Johnson’s fourth issue, he contends, “The standard of review on factual insufficiency needs fur*411ther modification.” (Br. at iii, viii, 47.) Johnson criticizes the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision in Watson v. Texas:
According to Watson, when attacking the factual insufficiency of the evidence, an…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Darrel Wayne Loge v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- State v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- AMSPACHER v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.