Legal Opinion
United States v. Eleven Vehicles
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 5, 1995No. Civ. A. 91-6779PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
This case involves the forfeiture of personal property belonging to claimants Robert and Irene Ivy, husband and wife, as a result of claimant Robert Ivy’s involvement with alleged money laundering activities. On November 18, 1988, Congress broadened the sweep of the federal money laundering statutes, permitting the civil forfeiture not only of “gross receipts” of money laundering activities but also of property “involved in” money laundering. Claimants have moved for summary judgment, asserting that forfeiture can only be effected by the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Eleven VehiclesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit in Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburg Account No. 58-400738-1 in the Name of AbdiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. Eleven VehiclesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Diluglio v. Providence Auto Body, Inc., 89-0628 (1997)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1997